One thing that is interesting for me is getting used to the weight. The laptop is at least 1lbs lighter than my previous ones and the lightness is affecting how I’m used to holding and balancing the laptop. But in any case, I’d loaded up a usb drive with Ubuntu 11.04 (latest as of this post) and tried to boot a live image using the laptop without the PMD. After the initial selection screen in the bootloader, it proceeded to load Ubuntu, but the LCD remained bank. I know it successfully booted into Ubuntu because I heard the usual chime/whatever played once the OS is up. Next was trying it out with the PMD. This time, it didn’t boot at all. I’ll try again with Ubuntu 10.04 and BackTrack5.
So, the LCD resolution has been a tricky issue. There have been arguments back and forth. Some argue the Full HD panel (1920 x 1080) is best. Others go for the 1600×900 panel claiming it is brighter and results in increased battery life, not to mention better readibility. So you can imagine I was a bit worried about my choice – the 1600×900 version. I have to say that I’m pretty pleased with my decision – though it is not without hiccups. Anything at standard definition or lower definitely looks “low res” now. But the upside – the sweet sweet upside – HD resolution videos look amazing on this panel. And it’s got the hardware to decode things for incredibly smooth playback. I used to think that media shot in lower than HD resolution would still be with us for many years to come. But after this experience, you can bet that I will utilize every opportunity I have to watch things in HD.
Oh and yes, the mic in the noise canceling earphones bundled with the laptop can be used as a microphone source.